Skip to content

June 16, 1973

Telegram from Pyongyang, No.061.238, Urgent, SECRET

This document was made possible with support from ROK Ministry of Unification

수신: 제1관계국

 

서울에서 열린 남북조절위원회 제3차 회담 결과에 따라 다음 문제에 대해 보고한다:

서울 회담이 양측의 상당한 긴장상황에서 열린 바, 북남 문제에 대하여 어떠한 진행을 이루지 못했다.

 

(북남 관계에 대한 우리 분석에 따르면, 서울 회담 전날 밤, 조선민주주의인민공화국은 1972년 11월 4일 체결한 협약에 위배되는 바와 같이 남측을 향해 라디오 방송을 시작했으며 비무장지대에 확성기를 사용하는 등의 행동을 시작했다.)

 

이번 회담에서 북측과 남측이 제시한 입장은 내용과 양측의 접근 측면에서 기본적으로 달랐다. 그럼에도 북조선은 또 다시 다음을 제시했다:

 

  1. 이전 회담에서 제시되었던 5도 제안;

 

  1. 북측과 남측 [조선]의 당과 민간 조직, 다양한 방면의 고위급 인사 간의 정치적 회담 개최 제안;

 

  1. 5개의 양자협력 위원회 창설 제안.

 

핵심적인 군사 및 정치 문제가 해결될 수 있다고 생각한 바, 남측은 경제와 사회문화적 협력체를 개설하고 실시할 준비가 되었다고 말했다. 그들은 이러한 협력체가 점진적인 상호 신뢰 회복을 기반으로 [양측 간] 기본적인 문제의 점진적 해결을 위한 체제 구축을 보장할 수 있을 것이라고 주장했다.

 

같은 경제 및 사회문화적 주제에 기반하여, 남측은 상호 개방을 제안하였다. 이는 북측 또한 수용한 원칙이기는 하지만 정치, 군사, 외교사안을 포함한 모든 주제가 포함되어야 한다는 평양의 고집 때문에 결실을 맺지 못했다.

 

조절위원회 북측 공동의장인 박성철 부상이 서울에서 귀환하며 열린 기자회견 후, 남측은 그들이 이미 외교관계를 가지고 있는 국가들과 북측이 외교관계를 맺고 국제기구에 가입하고자 하는 행동을 통해 두 개의 한국 존재를 고수하려는 북측의 입장에 비판적이었음을 알 수 있었다.

 

남측의 공격에 반박 없이, 부상은 만약 남한이 나라를 ‘두 한국’으로 만들고자 하는 것이 아니라면 국제사회에서 협력을 추진하는 외교위원회를 만들자는 [북측의] 제안을 즉시 받아들여야 할 것이라고 말했다.

 

북남 관계의 이러한 새로운 국면을 분석하면, 조선 문제가 양 측이 각기 다른 해결책과 서로에게 대항하는 외부요소에 기대어 서울과 평양 간 직접적인 경로로 움직이고 있다는 우리 사무소[대사관]의 지난 보고의견을 재확인할 수 있었다.

 

서명: Aurelian Lazăr

 

To the First Direction, Relations

 

With respect to the proceedings of the Third Session of the South-North Coordinating Committee, which met in Seoul, we would like to inform you of the following matters:

 

Since the Seoul session took place in a state of significant tension between the two sides, it did not mark any sort of progress in Inter-Korean matters.

 

(In addition to our analysis regarding the North-South relationship, we would like to point out the fact that on the eve of the Seoul session, the DPRK resumed broadcasting radio shows towards the South, using amplifiers installed in the demilitarized zone and infringing the commitments it assumed in the protocol signed on 4 November 1972.)

 

This time, the positions expressed by the North and the South were essentially different both in content and in the approach adopted by each side. Yet again, the North Koreans put forward:

 

  1. The 5-point plan released at the previous meeting;
  2. The idea of summoning political consultations between parties, civil societies, high-profile personalities in various fields, from both North and South [Korea];
  3. The idea of creating 5 bilateral cooperation commissions.

 

Thinking that the core military and political issues can be solved, the South said it was ready to form and launch the economic and socio-cultural cooperation commissions, arguing that they can guarantee the framework for the gradual resolution of fundamental problems, based on the gradual restoration of mutual trust.

 

On the basis of the same economic and socio-cultural matters, the South put forward the idea of a ‘mutual general opening’ which, although embraced in principle by the North, bore no fruit because of Pyongyang’s insistence that all fields, including political, military, diplomatic issues, be included.

 

After the press conference of the North Korean co-president of the Coordinating Committee, Vice-Premier Pak Seong-cheol, that was held upon his return from Seoul, it could be gathered that the South criticized the North for enshrining the existence of two ‘Koreas,’ by seeking membership in international organizations and by establishing diplomatic relations with states with which South Korea already has relations.

 

Without providing arguments to refute the accusations issued by the South, the Vice-Premier said that if the South Koreans do not wish to transform the country into ‘two Koreas’ then they should immediately accept the proposal regarding the creation of the diplomatic commission for the coordination of joint actions on the international arena.

 

After analyzing this new moment in North-South relations, we could confirm the previous conclusion of our office that the resolution of the Korean matter is increasingly heading on a path of direct channels between Seoul and Pyongyang, each camp using collateral solutions and the support given by external factors against the other Korean side.

 

Signed: Aurelian Lazar

 

Romanian officials report on the third session of the North-South Coordination Committee (NSCC) in Seoul. Due to differences in each side's ideas on cross-border cooperation and the organization of NSCC, the meeting ended without notable accomplishments. Both sides blame each other for espousing two separate Koreas.

Author(s):


Document Information

Source

Romanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archives, Matter 220, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Korea, Secret, MFA, Folder no. 1515, First Directorate – Relations, Regarding Relations between North and South Korea and the Position of Various States on this Topic, January 16 – July 30, 1973. Obtained and translated for NKIDP by Eliza Gheorghe.

Rights

The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.

To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at [email protected].

Original Uploaded Date

2012-05-17

Type

Telegram

Language

Record ID

114064

Original Classification

Secret

Donors

ROK Ministry of Unification and Leon Levy Foundation