Skip to content

December 18, 1973

Memorandum of Conversation Between the Head of the Far Eastern Department in the East German Foreign Ministry Liebermann and Chinese Ambassador Peng Guangwei on China's Intention to Establish Diplomatic Presence in West Berlin

This document was made possible with support from Leon Levy Foundation

[GDR Ministry of Foreign Affairs]

Far East Department

China Section

 

Berlin, December 18, 1973

 

Memorandum 

about a Conversation between Gen. Liebermann, head of the Far Eastern Department, and the Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the DDR Peng Guangwei

December 13, 1973

 

Gen. Liebermann requested the discussion. The participants were Comrade Dr. Müller (Deputy Director of the West Berlin Division), Comrade Karl (China Sector) and the Chinese ambassador’s translator. 

Comrade Dr. Müller read aloud as ordered a statement of the GDR’s position on questions related to West Berlin (for the exact wording see the attached). These statements were then informally handed over in writing. 

Amb. Peng thanked him for the information he presented on orders of the MfAA regarding the position of the GDR government on West Berlin and underscored that he had the duty as ambassador of transmitting these considerations to his government. He expressed the view that the diplomatic relations between our two countries should be further developed, although differences of opinion existed on various questions.  Therefore, he thought that an exchange of views between the two sides would be useful. He asked whether the above information was provided only to the embassy of the PRC or to all foreign missions in the GDR and whether there were many countries that wanted to establish representation in West Berlin.  

Comrade Dr. Müller answered both questions. He detailed in particular that the socialist countries that sought to establish representation in West Berlin (for example Hungary, Bulgaria), already set out from the stated principles that had been agreed upon with the GDR. He additionally pointed out that due to previous efforts by the GDR, many countries shared the position of the GDR. 

Amb. Peng then remarked that he did not want to speak about the previous policy of the PRC as to West Berlin, which in his mind was already known to Comrade Liebermann. From his perspective, a complicated situation had arisen in the question of West Berlin, although not for reasons that were not associated with China’s policies. Since the situation is complicated, he said, China handles the question of West Berlin with caution. China acts vis a vis West Berlin in such a fashion that corresponds to the existing situation.  Based on the GDR side’s statements, one would have to think that the GDR counted China as one of those countries that wanted to establish a representation in West Berlin. To the best of his knowledge, he said, China would continue to handle Berlin on the basis of the already existing situation. With this, though, he did not want to say that the GDR side’s statements were unnecessary. In his opinion, an exchange of views was important and necessary for the development of relations. Therefore, he was thankful again for the information regarding the position of the GDR regarding West Berlin. 

Comrades Liebermann and Müller pointed out that it is a natural desire of the GDR to present the position of the GDR government to certain questions and to hope that this position will be respected. They stated that we also view an exchange of views as useful for shaping diplomatic relations. To them, this was also about learning the other country’s position. From discussions with comrades in the MVR, KVDR, and DRV, it was apparent to them that these countries have the same opinions as we do on the question of West Berlin. With regards to the complicatedness of the question of West Berlin, they stated that the Quadripartite Agreement created legally binding conditions that serve for détente and the development of normal relations. The complicatedness of the situation stems from the efforts of the BRD to undermine the Quadripartite Agreement, to accomplish their annexation-related efforts, which contradict this agreement, and to unilaterally change the situation to the benefit of the BRD. 

Comrade Dr. Müller answered an interposed question regarding the problem of West Berlin in the negotiations between the CSSR and the BRD. He demonstrated that through the basic attitude of the CSSR, the attempts by the BRD to undermine the Quadripartite Agreement through the question of legal assistance were rebuffed. 

Amb. Peng thanked him for this additional information. He stated that the Chinese embassy in the GDR maintains contacts with figures in West Berlin. The government of the PRC, he said, handles relations with West Berlin according to the existing situation. The embassy would hold to this in its contacts with West Berliners. It is however necessary, he said, to receive more exact information about the situation in West Berlin. He therefore would like to express the wish that department leader or other colleagues of the MfAA later give him or his colleagues more information regarding this question. 

Comrades Liebermann and Müller responded to this desire positively. From their perspective one must proceed from the necessity and the usefulness of an exchange of views. In such a situation, the opportunity to avoid misunderstandings to a certain degree also plays a role. At the same time, it must be pointed out that the GDR is also interested in the Chinese side also informing it about its relations to West Berlin or the contacts the Chinese embassy has to West Berlin. 

With this, the discussion, which proceeded in a matter-of-fact atmosphere, ended. 

Comment:

The discussion with Amb. Peng has shown that it is correct vis a vis the PRC to state the position of the GDR regarding certain questions in an offensive manner. For this reason, Amb. Peng’s wish should be answered, to give further information about our policy vis a vis West Berlin and the situation in West Berlin, at a yet to be determine point in time. 

[signature]

Karl

Section Head

 

Attachment

 

(for distribution see overleaf)

 

This memorandum of conversation between the Head of the Far East Department in the East German Foreign Ministry Liebermann and Chinese Ambassador Peng Guangwei refers to China's intention to establish diplomatic relations with West Berlin. The East German side stresses the fact that countries such as Hungary and Bulgaria also established diplomatic relations with West Berlin taking into considerations the conditions posed by the international law and that China should do the same.



Related Documents

July 18, 1973

Letter, Oskar Fischer to Cde. Hermann Axen, 'Text of a Statement to be Presented Verbally to the Council of the Embassy of the PR China to the GDR'

Documents related to East Germany's protest against the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. The East German Ministry of Foreign Affairs stresses that West Berlin cannot be regarded as part of West Germany. Therefore, by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin without considering the existence of the internationally acknowledged Four Power Agreement on Berlin between the US, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, China is deliberately acting against the interests of East Germany.

August 2, 1973

Memorandum regarding a Discussion by Comrade Karl, Head of the China Section, with First Secretary of the Embassy of the PRC Qi Huaiyuan On October 2, 1973

This is a memorandum on a conversation reflecting the differences of opinion between the head of the China Desk in the East German Foreign Ministry and the First Secretary of the Chinese Embassy Qi Huaiyuan with regard to the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. East Berlin is clearly concerned such a step might favor West Germany's alleged goal of winning sovereignty over West Berlin, in violation of the Four Power Agreement. Qi states that he does not understand the East German position, and that the activities of Chinese diplomats in West Berlin are in accordance with international law. He rejects the notion that these relations might conceivably harm the interests of East Germany.

July 18, 1973

Notice for Comrade Fischer, 'Document for a Conversation with the Ambassador of the PR China'

Documents related to East Germany's protest against the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. The East German Ministry of Foreign Affairs stresses that West Berlin cannot be regarded as part of West Germany. Therefore, by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin without considering the existence of the internationally acknowledged Four Power Agreement on Berlin between the US, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, China is deliberately acting against the interests of East Germany.

July 23, 1973

Comment for Comrade Minister Oskar Fischer

Documents related to East Germany's protest against the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. The East German Ministry of Foreign Affairs stresses that West Berlin cannot be regarded as part of West Germany. Therefore, by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin without considering the existence of the internationally acknowledged Four Power Agreement on Berlin between the US, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, China is deliberately acting against the interests of East Germany.

Document Information

Source

Included in the document reader for the international conference "China and the Warsaw Pact in the 1970-1980s" held by CWHIP and the Parallel History Project March 2004 in Beijing. Translated by Samuel Denney.

Rights

The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.

To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at [email protected].

Original Uploaded Date

2012-08-08

Type

Memorandum of Conversation

Language

Record ID

114806

Donors

Leon Levy Foundation and The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars