Skip to content

December 3, 1973

Memorandum about a Discussion between Comrade Rodin, 1st Secretary of the Soviet Embassy, with the Head of the West Berlin Press Office, Dr. Struve

This document was made possible with support from Leon Levy Foundation

West Berlin Department

Berlin, December 3, 1973

 

Memorandum

about a discussion between Comrade Rodin, 1st Secretary of the Soviet Embassy, with the Head of the West Berlin Press Office, Dr. Struve

Comrade Rodin informed me of the above cited conversation, which took place on November 29 immediately after Bahr’s discussion with the West Berlin executive committees.

1. Struve explained, that in the conversation with Bahr, Schütz allegedly “accomplished that he [Bahr] would support the Senate’s position on the question of the minimum exchange.” Bahr and the BRD government are allegedly, according to Struve, “now of the opinion that the measure taken by the DDR also violates the letter of the agreement.” Further, Struve expressed that Brandt “will strengthen this position” during his upcoming visit to West Berlin. 

Struve explained further that if the discussions between Kunze and Mitdank do not lead to an arrangement on the business of the minimum exchange along the Senate’s lines, then not only the BRD government but also the Western allies would be brought in. 

Struve attempted to that effect to exert pressure in that he pointed to consequences for the DDR and the Soviet Union if the DDR did not find itself ready for a change of the minimum exchange (Credit question and European Security Conference). 

Comrade Rodin in contrast very expressively stated our position on the question of the minimum exchange and warned against attempts to further sharpen the situation. 

Struve thereupon explained that our side should understand that the SPD allegedly finds itself in a “very difficult domestic political situation.” The last polls supposedly showed that the popularity of Brandt and his government have sunk. This has led to concern among SPD leadership circles. On the other hand, according to Struve, Schütz had gained popularity due to his “hard line.” The West Berlin SPD and the Senate would see it as one of their duties “to force a hard line on the BRD government.”

Comrade Rodin warned Struve against such a “hard line.”

2. During the conversation, Struve expressed the desire, as Comrade Rodin explained, to meet me for an “unofficial conversation.” Comrade Rodin asked me what I think about it. I responded that I do not find such an unofficial conversation with Struve to be appropriate in the current situation. Further, I explained that I would of course inform my superiors about this.

3. Struve also went into the opinion of Beijing on the questions affecting West Berlin during the conversation. In connection with the Genscher’s short visit to the PRC, Struve expressed that “the Chinese support our position fully and completely.” The Chinese side allegedly turned to the Senate with the suggestion to open a Chinese trade representation and a general consulate in West Berlin. According to Struve’s statements, the Chinese representative had explained that the above-mentioned institution would be “directly subordinate to the embassy of the PRC in Bonn.”

Comrade Rodin remarked that if these statements from Struve were true, then the behavior of the Chinese side would explicitly contradict the agreements of the Quadripartite Agreement. To him, it is apparent that the Senate tried to “play the Chinese card” in the discussion with us. 

[signature]

Mitdank

 

Distribution:

Gen. Fischer

Gen. Dr. Kohl

Gen Krolikowski/FO

ZID

Dept. BRD

[GDR] Embassy Beijing

Dept. WB

 

This is a memorandum of a conversation between the first secretary of the Soviet embassy in East Berlin, Rodin, and the director of the West Berlin Press Office, Günter Struve, with regard to China's intention to establish a trade representation in West Berlin. Apart from stressing that by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin, China is not implicitly acknowledging the existing international agreements, Rodin makes clear that East Germany will not rescind the rules on obligatory currency exchange for citizens of Western states.



Related Documents

July 18, 1973

Letter, Oskar Fischer to Cde. Hermann Axen, 'Text of a Statement to be Presented Verbally to the Council of the Embassy of the PR China to the GDR'

Documents related to East Germany's protest against the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. The East German Ministry of Foreign Affairs stresses that West Berlin cannot be regarded as part of West Germany. Therefore, by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin without considering the existence of the internationally acknowledged Four Power Agreement on Berlin between the US, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, China is deliberately acting against the interests of East Germany.

August 2, 1973

Memorandum regarding a Discussion by Comrade Karl, Head of the China Section, with First Secretary of the Embassy of the PRC Qi Huaiyuan On October 2, 1973

This is a memorandum on a conversation reflecting the differences of opinion between the head of the China Desk in the East German Foreign Ministry and the First Secretary of the Chinese Embassy Qi Huaiyuan with regard to the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. East Berlin is clearly concerned such a step might favor West Germany's alleged goal of winning sovereignty over West Berlin, in violation of the Four Power Agreement. Qi states that he does not understand the East German position, and that the activities of Chinese diplomats in West Berlin are in accordance with international law. He rejects the notion that these relations might conceivably harm the interests of East Germany.

July 18, 1973

Notice for Comrade Fischer, 'Document for a Conversation with the Ambassador of the PR China'

Documents related to East Germany's protest against the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. The East German Ministry of Foreign Affairs stresses that West Berlin cannot be regarded as part of West Germany. Therefore, by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin without considering the existence of the internationally acknowledged Four Power Agreement on Berlin between the US, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, China is deliberately acting against the interests of East Germany.

July 23, 1973

Comment for Comrade Minister Oskar Fischer

Documents related to East Germany's protest against the intended establishment of a Chinese trade representation in West Berlin. The East German Ministry of Foreign Affairs stresses that West Berlin cannot be regarded as part of West Germany. Therefore, by initiating diplomatic relations with West Berlin without considering the existence of the internationally acknowledged Four Power Agreement on Berlin between the US, Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, China is deliberately acting against the interests of East Germany.

Document Information

Source

Included in the document reader for the international conference "China and the Warsaw Pact in the 1970-1980s" held by CWHIP and the Parallel History Project March 2004 in Beijing. Translated by Samuel Denney.

Rights

The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.

To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at [email protected].

Original Uploaded Date

2012-08-08

Type

Memorandum of Conversation

Language

Record ID

114805

Donors

Leon Levy Foundation and The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars